|
|
Review: "Outrage"Rated resulted in a change to that institution's policies, and a real-world impact wouldn't be unexpected from Outrage. Granted, the homophobia-driven shady dealings addressed in Outrage aren't institutionalized, but the media coverage that the film's allegations may spur could lead to some interesting revelations in the traditional media. Interestingly, that's where similarities to Rated end. While that film's undercover, gun-and-run approach to pulling back the MPAA's curtain (including hiring a lesbian private detective to stalk ratings board members) gave the film a thrilling, anti-establishment energy, Outrage owes more to Ken Burns than Michael Moore. There are no searing undercover stings of gay politicians to be found here ... at least none that can't be read about on any number of blogs already. In fact, the film's relative calm and clinical approach might be its biggest failing, as even the interstitial graphics are meant to look like microfilm and case file evidence (as though this were a particularly gay and bloodless episode of NCIS). Despite its much-touted controversial nature and scathing expose of the conservative right, Outrage ultimately plays it pretty safe, leaving the dirty work to the muckrakers who have been doing it all along, and thereby keeping a comparatively safe distance from its targets.
The decision might secure the film more mainstream appeal and take the conversation to another level, but die-hard activists may find the approach to be a missed opportunity. And let's face it, when a film opens promising "a profound conspiracy" and fails to deliver one, you have to wonder what might have been left on the cutting room floor. Still, what's there is well-rendered. The discussion is presented in an effective arc that begins with politicians whose closeting has led to ruin, and ends with more inspirational stories of those who have come out and bettered their lives including Barney Frank, Rep. Jim Kolbe and former Republican National Committee field director Dan Gurley as well as those who are still trying to find that balance (Jim McGreevey. These stories undercut the sensationalistic elements of Outrage and inspires at least a little sympathy for the men still living a lie. There's also a considerable amount of humor to lighten the mood. Some comes from the hilariously bad campaign ads that Dick has dug up from some of the politicians' old campaigns, and of course a movie filled with gay talking heads is going to have its share of great zingers: "You can't swing a dead cat without hitting a gay staffer on Capitol Hill" ... "[Washington] is like a Broadway show - everything is staged, everything is planned." But not all the humor is well-placed. One example: while you won't find a bigger fan of the infamous Shepard Smith "Jennifer Lopez blowjob" on-air gaffe (Google it - it's worth it), even I found it out of place in a segment alleging that the FOX News anchor is gay and picks up men at an Upper East Side piano bar. When it focuses on the positives of living an out, open and authentic life, Outrage's message is almost inspirational. The clip of Harvey Milk urging people to come out over thirty years ago that closes the film is both touching and terrifying, considering how far we've yet to go. And when it's not, it's at least a well-documented cautionary tale that should spark broader discussion of the integrity of the men and women who are making our laws, and the larger implications of living a closeted life.
Either way, the message should be clear to politicians who choose to commit their energies to blocking gay rights while living secret gay lives: this summer, it's open season on hypocrites. Watch the trailer for Outrage:
Submitted by on Wed, 2009-05-06 21:24. |
|

Shepard Smith is fair game. He works for the enemy: FOX!
I disagree with your subject line...
THere's a word for people like that --
a fortiori
http://www.laweekly.com/2009-05-07/film-tv/fear-itself/
Upset and Scared Republicans
Joe.My.God has an interesting post about the movie.
http://joemygod.blogspot.com/2009/05/dc-newscaster-threatens-to-punch.html
Do I support Outing?
Yes!
Politicians' private lives are fair game as regards how they relate to their political activities.
For example, it's widely accepted that a politician's marital fidelity has a direct bearing on their political integrity. Republicans in particular considered the issue of whether Bill Clinton had relationships with women besides Hillary as being a matter of national interest, not a private concern. Likewise, in issues such as conflict-of-interest it is deemed important to know if a politician has relationships or business dealings with with people they promote legislation for. Even religious affiliation is considered open game. Obama's relationship with his former pastor, who made many inflammatory statements, was subject to intense scrutiny.
So why should homosexuality be off-limits? By saying that being gay or bi is a "private" matter that politicians shouldn't have to disclose people are arguing that homosexuality, fundamentally, something to be ashamed of or at least concealed to avoid stigma like alcoholism.
Of wait, bad analogy. Alcoholism would be considered fair game for public debate too.
So basically only homosexuality merits "privacy" as far as anti-Outing people go. But in the fine tradition of J. Edgar Hoover many self-hating gays often channel their homophobia outwards to deflect attention from themselves. There's no better cover for a self-hating gay politician than a good trophy wife or husband and a solid record of voting against gay rights issues.
So I think that Outrage sounds like a promising documentary. They may need to do regular sequels.
Cost of secrecy
Once the US Government spent $50million investigating the sex life of a President, it established a precedent by which the sexual orientation and behaviour of a politician could be - and should be - regarded as a matter of national importance. Irrespective of the moral considerations, once those politicians in Congress voted to pay vast sums of the taxpayers money to make public an essentially private matter, they accepted that the searchlight could and should be turned on them.
Karma is a bitch.
But aside from that, outing is not just important, it is vital to a struggle for equality. It is an ugly, but essential, blunt instrument to use against hypocrisy. Finesse in arguments and role models are massively important - but sometimes you need to punch out your opponents with a solid right hook. Once you publicly establish that sexuality knows no boundaries - that it is not a matter of class or creed or race or political affiliation - then it is virtually impossible to make the argument against gay and lesbian and transgendered rights being civil rights.
why on EARTH should we be surprised that Kirby Dick isn't gay?
Outrage-ous
Can't wait to see the film! The interview with Mike Rogers and McKelway is outrage-ous, if you have not already... McKelway acts like a child... McKelway (anchor) tells Rogers he'd like to "take you outside and punch you across the face."
http://news.aol.com/article/angry-anchor/478089
Director speaks about film
After the OUTRAGE screening at the Tribeca Film Festival, Kirby Dick, Rodger McFarlane, Michelangelo Signorile and Larry Kramer sat down for a Q&A Discussion with the audience and eachother.
Check it out here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c6OX8E5rdKc&feature=PlayList&p=DB75680A8FA88246&index=4
"I've been things and seen
"I've been things and seen places." -- Mae West
Thanks for posting this link - it adds a lot to the discussion. Rocky