Welcome to AfterElton.com!

Enter your AfterElton.com username.
Enter the password that accompanies your username.
News, Reviews & Commentary on Gay and Bisexual Men in Entertainment and the Media

Amazon.com decides gay books are "adult". Gay customers say, "WTF?"

What does a classic gay novel like James Baldwin's Giovanni's Room have to do with gay porn?

You'd think the answer would be pretty much "nothing." But if that's true, why would Amazon.com strip the sales ranks of it as well as almost all gay and lesbian books on their site — including Annie Proulx's Brokeback Mountain, Edmund White's A Boy's Own Story and 20s lesbian classic The Well of Loneliness — at the same time it's removing the sales rankings for adult novels?

And it's not just fiction. The blog Meta Writer said that affected titles also include The Advocate College Guide for LGBT Students, Taking a Chance on God: Liberating Theology for Gays, Lesbians, and Their Lovers, Families, and Friends and The Dictionary of Homophobia: A Global History of Gay & Lesbian Experience. And indeed, not one of those books has its sales ranking listed.

Asked "What's up with that?" by a number of authors, Amazon sent out a form response:

In consideration of our entire customer base, we exclude "adult" material from appearing in some searches and best seller lists. Since these lists are generated using sales ranks, adult materials must also be excluded from that feature. 

It's hard to know what's more disturbing: That they're removing gay and lesbian books from their search results and sales rankings in the first place, or that they're categorizing anything about our community and our lives in the stigmatized "adult" category even when there's nothing "adult" about it.

I mean, in what universe are books like Vito Russo's Celluloid Closet, Randy Shilts' The Mayor of Castro Street: The Life and Times of Harvey Milk or Dan Savage's The Kid: What Happened After My Boyfriend and I Decided to Go Get Pregnant adult books? 

I checked the gay young adult titles by AfterElton.com's Brent Hartinger, and they all still have their sales rankings. A few other YA titles I looked at didn't, however, including John Fox's The Boys on the Rock, Jim Grimsley's Dream Boy and, ironically, The Heart Has Its Reasons: Young Adult Literature with Gay/Lesbian/Queer Content, 1969-2004.

Neither did Heather Has Two Mommies, which has got to be one of the most banned books in American history. Nice company you're in, Amazon.

However, homophobes and wingnuts will be glad to know that Speechless: Silencing the Christians: How Liberals and Homosexual Activists are Outlawing Christianity (and Judaism) to Force Their Sexual Agenda on America was still being ranked.

Amazon.com has not responded to a request for a comment by AfterElton.com.

EDITOR's UPDATE: Here is the response Christie Keith just received from Amazon.com

Thanks for your message. There was a glitch with our sales rank feature that is currently being fixed.

Drew

A "glitch", huh? Um, how does this jive with Amazon's form letter above? It seems pretty damn clear that Amazon classified gay material as "adult" and are now trying to backtrack without admitting what they did. I do think the classification might have been inadvertent, but to call it a "glitch with our sales rank" without admitting responsibility is only compounding their mistake. Great to handle this P.R. disaster, Amazon!

Craig Seymour's picture

They've been doing this at least since February

http://craigspoplife.blogspot.com/2009/04/is-amazon-homophobic.html
DaChickenLady's picture

Idiotic

I would have never expected this from Amazon.com.

Until they change this idiotic practice, they have lost me as a customer.

Average (4 votes):
see individual ratings
David Ehrenstein's picture

BOYCOTT AMAZON!

It's just that simple.
Average (4 votes):
see individual ratings
Zam's picture

Amazon & Towerload

Time to hit them with the PR machine too, Google-Bomb them.  Make sure this catches the attention of the MSM.

http://www.smartbitchestrashybooks.com/index.php/weblog/comments/amazon-rank/

I haven't caught anything about this on HuffPo or CNN yet. 

Since everyone is up in arms today, stop on over at Towerload and check the barely visible link in the upper right-hand corner of the big yellow box at the bottom of the main page.  The one that reads "%&$@ barack obama". 

Except the swear-symbols I used replace the racially derogatory N-word that appears on the their site.  [a friend tells me it links to a bunch of other sites that refers to our President by that word].  Highly inappropriate!

The Towerload issue appears to have been corrected.

Allyndra's picture

I signed the online

I signed the online petition and emailed customer service. I agree that boycotting is a good idea, but boycotting and being vocal about our outrage is better.

Petition is here: http://www.thepetitionsite.com/1/in-protest-at-amazons-new-adult-policy 

Average (4 votes):
see individual ratings
brentbent's picture

Here's a link to known censored books

http://community.livejournal.com/meta_writer/11992.html This is absurd! I wrote and told them no more money from me and I own a Kindle. I said if their sole concern was "protecting the children" then they should create an Amazon Kids portal and not screw with their search engine in a way that censors GLBT works. to contact Amazon: connect-help@amazon.com Jeffrey Bezos, CEO 1200 12th Avenue South, Seattle, Washington 98144-2734, United States Phone: 206-266-1000 Fax: 206-622-2405 ETA: More useful links from the comments below: Amazon Investor Relationships Contact (5+ / 0-) If you own or if your 401K has amazon stocks there, please please consider contacting Investor Relations: Investor Relations P.O. Box 81226 Seattle, WA 98108-1226 Phone: (206) 266-2171 Fax: (206) 266-1355 E-mail: ir@amazon.com
Average (2 votes):
see individual ratings
Christie Keith's picture

meta_writer blog

I did link to and cite that meta_writer entry in my post here... it's a great resource on this issue.
Average (1 vote):
see individual ratings
Liz's picture

oh hell no....

*signs petition* this is asinine.
Average (3 votes):
see individual ratings
jakob's picture

one disturbing effect can

one disturbing effect can be seen by going to amazon.com and doing a search for "homosexuality".

the first entry on the first page of results is "A Parents guide to preventing homosexuality".  Also on that first page of results "jesus, the bible and homosexuality" "Can homosexuality be healed" "You Don't have to be Gay" and "Homosexuality and hte bible"

there are a few gay friendly books there too, but if they go the same way that others have, a search for homosexuality could end up giving only books like the above

Average (5 votes):
see individual ratings
Matt's picture

Titles

Don't assume just because the word Bible or Jesus is in the title means the book is anti-gay.  I found "Jesus, the Bible, and Homosexuality: Explode the Myths, Heal the Church" on the first page, I'm assuming this is the title you were talking about.  If you actually read the descriptions it's all about why Christians should accept homosexuality.  Also the Title "Homosexuality and the Bible: Two Views" was on the first page.  I haven't read it, but from what I can tell it attempts to be neutral offering both an anti and a pro gay essay.  However, I would agree in your general argument that removing books based solely on their homosexual content is a terrible thing to do. (Note: the other books you mentioned were indeed despicable)
Nukely's picture

Prevent Homos, please

That is revolting. To search Amazon for the term homosexuality, and the first hit is a book on how to prevent homosexuality in your children? a topic which the medical Community considers unhealthy and which, imho, amounts to torture, -this is what Amazon wishes to promote? Lord help us. I mean that as a prayer, because I don't think we have any other chance against these types of evil tides.

 

Average (2 votes):
see individual ratings
T.W.'s picture

Amazon search

Another thing I've seen frequently talked about around the interweb is that an Amazon search for "homosexuality" first gives "A Parent's Guide to Preventing Homosexuality."  Other results on the first page include: "You Don't Have to Be Gay: Hope and Freedom for Males Struggling With Homosexuality or for Those Who Know of Someone Who Is", and "Can Homosexuality Be Healed?"  

I can't say what the results would have been before Amazon started trying to (inconsistently) protect their customers from "adult" material, but I do find these search results...interesting.

Average (6 votes):
see individual ratings
Liz's picture

say whaaaat?

"Another thing I've seen frequently talked about around the interweb is that an Amazon search for "homosexuality" first gives "A Parent's Guide to Preventing Homosexuality."

^ WHAAAAAAT? * goes to check for self* I can't believe this shit. who is in charge of amazon? is there a person who runs it or is behind it?

Average (4 votes):
see individual ratings
Nukely's picture

Censorship in the USA

This is a sad turn of events for the internet.

t is called censorship. Something this country used to stand firmly against. Because the internt is a new medium, it means that the bigots can impose their old rules as if nothing has happened since the 15th century. Censorship is one of the most powerful tools in the bigots' arsenal. The only response that could possibly effect them is a full on boycott of Amazon.

I would call for

  1. A clear definition of "adult material." What are the criteria they are basing this on?
  2. A citizens (or users) group that can judge the works in question and publish their review for other users to discuss. Amazon has a huge user based wiki to describe every book ever written, they can afford to establish a peer review board on the issue of censoring books..

 

 

Average (1 vote):
see individual ratings
T.W.'s picture

User Group

I'm not sure I'm following your second suggestion.  So, it would be OK to identify something as adult and exclude it from searches (i.e. censor it and/or prevent customers from thinking for themselves) as long as a user group - instead of Amazon owners or employees - judges and reviews the work?  How is censorship by committee any better?  Who determines who is a member of this evaluation group?  Why should I trust their reviews anymore than anyone else?  As long as a group of people disapproves of something, that product/author can be removed or treated differently than others at the site?

Am I misunderstanding you?  Please explain.

Average (1 vote):
see individual ratings
Nukely's picture

Censorship User Groups

Yes, you do understand me., but I left it vague for that reason.

Censorship happens every day, as we know, on a personal basis. When I was a kid, my mom wouldn't allow me to watch Laugh In. Kind of a joke considering her potty mouth, I think she just used it as an excuse to put me to bed early.

But there are works of 'art' that I would like to keep from my children, like a fisting video for example. Can we first agree that there are in fact works that should be kept from children? If so, then what are the criteria for that type of ban.

I am not advocating a lynch mob, but a transparent process, like a wiki. Where I can read, discuss and contribute my opinion on a work, and hopefully help in forming some kind of criteria that fairly applies across all works of art, not just gay writings.

I do agree with Ann Frank, that people are born basically good. We learn bigotry. When ever we are able to shine a light on that, when we can openly discuss something like the merits of censoring a specific work, we have a chance to bring out people's better nature; to "un-learn" them.

This is the main fear of the Bigot Elite. They have crunched the numbers, believe me. They know what, in fact, diminishes bigotry and therefore diminishes their evil ranks. My guess is that this is the result of one of two things.

  1. A take over of Amazon stocks by persons hostile to enlightenment in general and gay people specifically.
  2. A pre-strike, which groups like the AFA seem to be targeting. That is to threaten a boycott prior to actually creating one or discussing one with the rank an file. 

A letter from the AFA can create a knee jerk reaction from TPTB in a corporation, from people who are generally removed from public opinions. Hard to say how often this has been used or been useful to their cause, it is insidious. I am beginning to believe that this is the main device used by groups like the AFA. We will never know how often these types of threats are made. Therefore, it is imperative that we stand against Amazon in this. It will show other corporations that a preemptive threat from the AFA is actually a heads up that they are doing the right thing.

It seems that corporations are especially susceptible to the later, these days. We need to find a way to make that type of threat from the wing nuts unattractive. Now may be the time an place

 

 

T.W.'s picture

Individual Responsibility

Quote:

But there are works of 'art' that I would like to keep from my children, like a fisting video for example. Can we first agree that there are in fact works that should be kept from children? If so, then what are the criteria for that type of ban.

I am not advocating a lynch mob, but a transparent process, like a wiki. Where I can read, discuss and contribute my opinion on a work, and hopefully help in forming some kind of criteria that fairly applies across all works of art, not just gay writings.

Absolutely there are things that are not appropriate for children, but it is the responsibility of parents to determine what those things are and when it becomes appropriate for their children to discuss, view or read them. It is not the right or responsibility of corporations or groups of faceless people on the internet.  If a group of bigots banded together and succeeded in getting something labeled as worthy of censorship ("adult"), does that mean it is? By the same token, if something passed these criteria, would you let children watch/read it without verifying for yourself that it is indeed something you'd want them to be exposed to?

There are already forums to provide reviews at Amazon, which if used properly, can serve the function you suggested. My problem is not with the transparency of the process or who's establishing the criteria.  I dislike the idea of treating materials differently (whether they are gay-themed or not) and taking the choice away from adults, parents, customers, etc. who have the right and responsibility to make those decisions for themselves. 

Average (3 votes):
see individual ratings
Liz's picture

their reply...

"There was a glitch with our sales rank feature that is currently being fixed."

^ HUH? this sales rank feature glitch only seemed to effect lgbt books though. that's a hell of a glitch.

it's ok to say if they were afraid of offending someone...and i would applaud them if they also said "we realize now that didn't help another group of people and we are sorry"

Average (1 vote):
see individual ratings
Christie Keith's picture

Yeah...

funny, that.
duckiestoy's picture

Crying Wolf?

Folks are up in arms, pitchforks in hand, and yet ignore the evidence that it only effected some LGBT books (Brian's books were not effected, for example) suggesting a glitch as Amazon claims rather than some vast anti-gay conspiracy.

I object to assumption by the article that adult equals porn.

 

twin88's picture

Jezebel has a good article

Jezebel has a good article on this as well.

I think the fact that Ellen Degeneres's biography somehow falls under the category of "adult" material and Ron Jeremy's does not pretty much makes them all look like fools.

I mean, seriously. I get that the whole "adult material" thing was just a spur of the moment lie when they saw they were about to get busted for something they've been surreptitiously doing for months now.  But couldn't they have paused for a single second before typing out that email and thought "hmmmm... I wonder if anyone will notice all the thousands of truly adult material that remains ranked?"

Ugh.  Idiots.  Homophobic, prejudiced,  hateful idiots.

Average (4 votes):
see individual ratings
Joseph's picture

I heard about it this afternoon...

...and just had to confirm my worst fears: Graham Robb's The Discovery of France, a history of the amalgamation of French culture over the past 300 years, can still be found easily by typing in the title then not hitting "go" and still has a sales rank; but Robb's Strangers: Homosexual Love in the 19th Century, cannot be easily searched and does not display a sales rank. There's nothing "adult" about the latter book.

You can bet I'm going to let Amazon know what I think and that I will take my business elsewhere unless they change their practices.

Average (4 votes):
see individual ratings
Craig Young's picture

"The History of Sexuality, Vol. 1" Michel Foucault

I remember reading this in my first year of college. So weird. We live in such a bizare country. The point of many of these books are not "adult" points. They are points that any well rounded person should understand whether you agree with them or not. It's like now there is no attempt to actually understand the world.
Katie's picture

This is

CRAZY! Thats insane! What exaclty do they think makes these books "adult". A book ultimately becomes adult if it has gay content in it? Thats Bulls**t im sorry but thats not right on so many levels.

 

 

 

 

 

People fear what they don't understand.Thats why homophobes are so scared of gay people.

Average (2 votes):
see individual ratings
kcwin's picture

What's wrong with Amazon?

It seems there's a glitch in Amazon's sense of fairness and decency.
Flame's picture

Glitch my ass

One of many egregious examples I've seen:

This book, Conception, Pregnancy & Birth: The Childbirth Bible for Today's Parents, still has a ranking. (Scroll down to the "Product Details" section. There, for most books including this one, you will find the "Amazon.com Sales Rank:" But this has been removed for most LGBT books, adult or not.)

But if you look at this one, The New Essential Guide to Lesbian Conception, Pregnancy, and Birth, it doesn't, anymore. I know for a fact that it had a ranking when I bought it recently, because I checked them carefully before making my purchase. This one had better reviews (and I believe a higher ranking) than the one above.

Average (2 votes):
see individual ratings
netogeno's picture

Trolling?

Ive read about this since this afternoon and this is absolutely crazy. What on earth would make this company do such a thing, especially since it has been so helpfull to find and buy LGBT content. As a customer this was very distressing, but at the same time it seem so arbitrary and the ridiculous responses from Amazon seem so reactionary, and then I find something like this interesting article:

http://tehdely.livejournal.com/88823.html

Could we be facing a trolling attack? I know this is just a theory, but its an interesting and plausible one. What exactly would be the point of something like this? What would anyone gain?

In any case, Amazon has a lot to answer, for either taking this action or letting something like this happen.

This seemed so weird from the very beginning.  

 

Average (1 vote):
see individual ratings
Nukely's picture

Flagging

Interesting theory: that right wing groups use "flagging" (clicking to mark an entry as objectionable) as a method for banning an object. That's no excuse and not a good one either. It's what YouTube uses to ban any gay content while at the same time showing objectionable bigoted content. It is not transparent, we are not allowed to see if those actual votes exist or who may have cast them. But since YouTube gets away with blatant discrimination, well, everyone can discriminate because that's the norm now. Right? It is the norm because no one is willing to stand up to these idiots. Certainly not GLAAD.

If the Amazon flagging proves to be true I would love, love, love for a mass of people to put the bible and any book that mentions Jesus on an adult only list. But we all know, no matter how many millions of people did that it will never affect the ranking of the bible at Amazon. It isn't about Jesus vs Gay. It is about decency and book banning. Something that Amazon could care less about. We need to show the heartless bitches that they should care. As book purveyors, they should care a lot: Books are the life blood of knowledge and love and that's the reason why evil forces have always tried to ban them.

 

RobDave's picture

Apparently not in Canada

The Canadian version of Amazon (amazon.ca) has not done anything like that.  They have individual categories for Gay and Lesbian books and movies.  There isn't even an "adult" category.  Movies are further sub-divided into art house, comedies, documentaries, etc, while books are divided into biographies, history, fiction, parenting, etc.  A search for the book "Brokeback Mountain" immediately shows all the versions available and also cross-references it with every other department on the website, whether it be audiobooks, entertainment, history, mysteries or even French versions of it.
Average (2 votes):
see individual ratings
sugarray's picture

Its exactly the same with

Its exactly the same with the UK version of Amazon (amazon.co.uk).  Titles are organised under Books and then Gay & Lesbian - there is no adult section.  It seems this is just an issue with Amazon.com, not the company as a whole.
Average (1 vote):
see individual ratings
ScarletRose1324's picture

sick

Change is the law of life. And those who look only to the past or present are certain to miss the future.”~ J.F.Kennedy

its really f***ed up when you type in homosexuality & you get books popping up saying A Parents guide to preventing homosexuality - why can't amazon censor that instead???

boycotting, petitoning & emailing amazon.

Average (2 votes):
see individual ratings
Steve Berman's picture

I've long heard rumors that

I've long heard rumors that Amazon's Bezos supports Socially Conservative Republican causes. This new development does not shock me at all.

I recommend that people shop for books at either TLABooks.com (which is gay-owned and -operated) or Queerbooks.com (which is the online site for Giovanni's Room, the longest-continually operated gay bookseller in the nation). 

  Now Steve's New & Improved with Andre Norton Award Finalist power for Vintage! And is a Lambda Literary Award Finalist for Wilde Stories 2008!

www.steveberman.com

Average (3 votes):
see individual ratings
takethat200210's picture

I've sent them an email. Hopefully they come to their senses.

Here's the email I sent them.

"Hello,

 RE: UNREASONABLE SEARCH RESULTS - WILL STOP SHOPPING AT AMAZON.COM OR AMAZON.CA

 Please forward my message below to your management.  Thank you.

 I have recently noticed that a search of "homosexuality" yielded multiple listings of titles that SHOULD NOT be on the top of the list; titles such as "how to prevent homosexuality" and what bible says about homosexuality etc.  Seriously?  As a homosexual, I am gravely offended by this. 

 I sincerely hope you have been acting in the caution of merely political correctness and not by any other motives or hidden agenda.  Nevertheless, I will not purchase from your company again until this is resolved. 

 One point worth noting is that if I do a search on "Christianity" on Amazon.com, reasonable and logical titles would come up; such as, "Christianity: An Outline of Salvation and the Christian Life", or "Christianity-The First Two Thousand Years". 

 Is there any reason why that's not the same for "homosexuality"?  I'm pretty sure there are tons of excellent resources on homosexuality.  I hope your company doesn't consider "homosexuality" as pornographical in nature or adult-related, because, as you know, that'd be plain ignorant.

 Please feel free to respond if you wish.

[Name]

[Email address]"

Average (3 votes):
see individual ratings
Anonymous's picture

Why are the gay and lesbian

Why are the gay and lesbian fiction/nonfiction books often by the erotic sections in bookstores?  Why are gay mags like the Advocate, Instinct and Out in with the porno mags?  This isn't just happening at Amazon.
Average (2 votes):
see individual ratings
Liz's picture

got a point...

yeah, in dupont circle, there is a 'Books a million' and right by the 'gay/lesbian' section, there is all these erotic novels. hardcore erotica that is.

i wonder if it's only certain bookstores though. i know barnes and nobles (at least the ones i attend) has the gay/lesbian books halfway across the store from the erotic novels. the gay/lesbian books are by 'womens issues' and 'african american issues' and the erotic novels are by the travel maps. heh.

 

 

belinda's picture

"Adult"........

 

"Adult Category"-isn't mean that all kind of books/movie(gay & not)have a lot of

erotic scence will been list to this category?So i don't understand why Amazon.com

(this kind a huge company)make this stupid decision.

I don't understand why John Barrowman Biograpraphic list into adult category.cause

i buy this book at Borders Bookstore (Malaysia)and it not label in adult section.

so i really feel confused why Amazon.com make this decision????????  

 

 

 

Mister 2's picture

It comes down to this...

I would say society still leans towards gay content = adult, even if it's not sexual. So you will still see bookstores and newsstands that place the likes of the Advocate next to Hustler. Which pisses me off to no end. Somehow, by the time I was 7, I knew homosexuality was natural- that obviously men and women didn't always marry each other- sometimes men married men or women married women. So do children only come to this conclusion if they are gay themselves? 
TriplicateGuy's picture

Doubly distressing

First of all, Amazon does not sell porn to begin with, so the idea that a child could stumble upon a fisting video or a porn magazine is impossible. Are they going to drop rankings and star ratings on DVDs like Brokeback Mountain? Amazon makes a lot of money selling R-rated movies. Why the double standard with books? And censoring books on philosophy is just wrong on so many levels. I don't understand this development at all.

Does Amazon really have a big problem with kids buying theogical. medical, and political texts? Did Amazon actually sell a copy of Strangers: Homosexual Love in the 19th Century or The New Essential Guide to Lesbian Conception, Pregnancy, and Birth to a teenager and have to deal with subsequent parental complaints?

Really? I mean, really?

Average (3 votes):
see individual ratings
netogeno's picture

Amazon hacked?

So apparently, one should take this confession with a grain of salt so far, Amazon has been hacked over flagging post on Craiglist.

An infamous hacker claims he was trying to get back to the "hypocritical San Francisco gay community" and the flagging system in that site that flags his post about finding "chicks" to do heroin with, while the posts of all the post of "fat hairy gay men" looking for guys to do the same remain. So he decided to take on one of the most well known flagging systems in the internet with 10 lines of code.  The douche.

If this is true, I cant believe what a negligent and insensitive way to handle this from the part of Amazon. Someone should loose their job over that, and while they are at it they should loose their flagging system all together and just leave the ability to review and nothing else.

They have yet to say anything about it and I wonder how they are going to get out of this one. The good thing about it is that by browsing trough all the coverage I found independant and gay owned on line sellers that I can buy content with. 

Zam's picture

inside or outside job?

Now that we've had a night to sleep with our outrage...  
I'd seen a couple reports on trolling today. 
I'd like to believe that Amazon isn't practicing any systemic discrimination, but the handling of the matter by the company up to this point has been less than stellar.  Whether the cyber-attack is legit, or just someone trying to claim responsibility for their own noteriety is a question that deserves answering.
I'm also curious to learn whether the de-listing of titles has been going on since February as some posters have claimed, or if it was just something that happened over the last couple days.
I'm also very curious whether Amazon's TOS for listed items doesn't contain any security measures or notifications to sellers that their listings have been changed because of flagging (malicious or justified), whether there are mechanisms in place to dispute flagging, etc.
Amazon has more questions to answer than simply saying "oops, our bad" or "we were attacked".
Average (1 vote):
see individual ratings